Once upon a time, for reasons we are still uncovering, an ancient society convinced a large number of people to believe a narrative of fiction — even calling it scientifically-based — through a heavy veil of linguistic machinations.
~ Imagine that ~
It was demonically brilliant, and, we complied.
To our own destruction and that of our children’s children, we complied.
They say truth is stranger than fiction. Last night I came across an interview I find worthy of passing forward for those like myself trying to navigate the treacherous terrain of “trans” –transgender, transracial, trans-species and whatever is to be the next fiction we are being required to play along with…
What fascinated and held my interest most about this interview was the focus on language. While I am not opposed carte blanche to re-verbalizing (linguistic language adoption) age-old truths (or new concepts that are true) or adapting/articulating ideas in current language per se (in order to be thought of in new, re-packaged ways or better understood by other generations, cultures or sub-cultures) there does come a point when we need to say “enough” and call things what they are in no uncertain terms.
The level of linguistic gymnastics that are being employed (and required of us) to open the door wider and wider to evil is truly disturbing. I invite viewers (especially older) to stay with this interview to the end. I found myself somewhat distracted at noticing certain speech and communication patterns (reflective of younger generations) between the two speakers, and at points, direct or indirect references to related issues I might view somewhat differently. However, as I stayed with it, the level of content for consideration was well worth my time.
The focus of this interview is what was learned by a graduate student whose focus is the psycho-social impacts of transgender identification, otherwise known as “gender ideology.“ It is a fascinating delve into heavy amounts of intellectual/philosophical musings and absurdities relating, again, to language itself and how through increasingly expansive and non-sensical language/logic, children and others are suffering irreparable damage and harm. Language itself is a tool to systematically dismantle truth and replace it with all sorts of fiction. We must not remain ignorant of a number of entities with dark, powerful agendas that are permeating our churches, healthcare systems, preschools, grade schools, high schools, colleges, workplaces and institutions.
One of the most disturbing intrusions into systems that otherwise are in place to protect children are social services/school services/legal services now systematically removing the long-recognized human rights of parents to protect, guide and influence their own children.
In particular, the talk focuses on gender medicine (aka “gender affirming care”) and reveals the level of destructive darkness (especially engulfing our children) that is masquerading as love and healthy support. The grad student attended a WPATH (World Professional Association for Transgender Health) conference in her town and discusses what she heard at this event.
Those concerned about children, and more, need to be made aware of these things before holding on to any already-formed , non-informed or ill-informed opinion. Facts matter. Information is power. Many of us (including myself) are only just beginning to understand the dark ideas driving the so-called gender ideology and accompanying medical, legal and political trends.
At the end, the interviewer (Benjamin A Boyce) focuses some on faith issues, dialoguing with Eliza Mondegreen, and revealing an amount of his own. I was unclear at points where he might be coming from, in that sense.
As I listened to the interview, I thought about the important role of language in the dystopian novel by George Orwell.
Newspeak is the fictional language of Oceania, a totalitarian superstate that is the setting of the 1949 dystopian novel Nineteen Eighty-Four, by George Orwell. In the novel, the Party created Newspeak[1]: 309 to meet the ideological requirements of Ingsoc (English Socialism) in Oceania. Newspeak is a controlled language of simplified grammar and restricted vocabulary designed to limit the individual’s ability to think and articulate “subversive” concepts such as personal identity, self-expression, and free will.[2] Such concepts are criminalized as thoughtcrime since they contradict the prevailing Ingsoc orthodoxy.[3][4]
– About George Orwell’s 1984 dystopian fiction
In “The Principles of Newspeak”, the appendix to the novel, Orwell explains that Newspeak follows most of the rules of English grammar, yet is a language characterised by a continually diminishing vocabulary; complete thoughts are reduced to simple terms of simplistic meaning. The political contractions of Newspeak—Ingsoc (English Socialism), Minitrue (Ministry of Truth), Miniplenty (Ministry of Plenty)—are described by Orwell as similar to real examples of German and Russian contractions in the 20th century. Like Nazi (Nationalsozialist), Gestapo (Geheime Staatspolizei), politburo (Political Bureau of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union), Comintern (Communist International), kolkhoz (collective farm), and Komsomol (communist youth union), the contractions in Newspeak, often syllabic abbreviations, are supposed to have a political function already in virtue of their abbreviated structure itself: nice sounding and easily pronounceable, their purpose is to mask all ideological content from the speaker.[1]: 310–8
The word “Newspeak” is sometimes used in contemporary political debate as an allegation that one tries to introduce new meanings of words to suit one’s agenda.[5][6]
“If you are protecting this idea, that does not have a basis in reality, you will sacrifice everything that you care about to uphold that idea.” (~Eliza Mondegreen, in the clip)
https://youtube.com/clip/UgkxrV5eF8qp2OAqS3eh3ie0-GxYuGFixbxK
Thank You For Reading
Please Feel Free To Express Your Thoughts Below
